All of the following are common law defenses against negligence, except?

The correct answer is that the Statute of Limitations is not a common law defense against negligence. Common law defenses refer to legal principles that allow a defendant to avoid liability in a negligence claim based on the circumstances of the case.

Contributory negligence is a common law doctrine where if the plaintiff is found to have any fault in causing the injury, they may be completely barred from recovering damages. This principle emphasizes the shared responsibility of both parties.

Comparative negligence, on the other hand, allows for the plaintiff's damages to be reduced by their percentage of fault in the incident. This doctrine provides a more balanced approach than contributory negligence, allowing for some recovery even if the plaintiff is partly responsible.

Assumption of risk involves the premise that a plaintiff may not recover damages if they voluntarily engaged in an activity with knowledge of the risks involved. This defense acknowledges that individuals can recognize and accept certain dangers, thus limiting liability.

The Statute of Limitations, however, is not a defense that involves the actions or state of mind of the parties involved during the event in question. Rather, it is a legal time limit imposed by law on how long a party has to bring a lawsuit after an incident occurs. Once the statute of limitations expires, a claim